Bibliographic record
Abstract
Back to table of contents Previous article Next article APA InstituteFull AccessExhibit Hall Visit Could Yield SurprisesJill GruberJill GruberPublished Online:5 Aug 2005https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.40.15.00400030aAPA's 2005 Institute on Psychiatric Services (IPS) is an informal, practical, and clinically focused multi-disciplinary meeting offering excellent educational sessions and the opportunity to network with colleagues from the United States and abroad.The central gathering point for the meeting will be the Exhibit Hall, which will be the site of morning coffee breaks and afternoon receptions. Commercial and educational exhibitors will be available to discuss the latest products and services for psychiatrists and mental health professionals. The APA Member Center and APA Job Bank, along with pharmaceutical-product information, the latest computer software, books, and other products, will be featured.Registrants who visit the Exhibit Hall will have opportunities to win prizes at both morning and afternoon drawings. The prizes this year, supported by IVAX Pharmaceuticals, will include a color television, Palm Pilot, personal copy machine, fax machine, cordless phone, DVD player, digital camera, video camera, stereo, notebook computer, free registration for the 2006 APA annual meeting in Toronto, Canada, and free registration for the 2006 institute in New York City.The exhibits will open at 1:30 p.m. on Thursday, October 6, and close at noon on Saturday, October 8. Celebration Recovery, hosted by the Irwin Foundation and APA (see article above), follows the close of the exhibits.▪Jill Gruber is associate director for the Institute on Psychiatric Services in APA's Annual Meetings Office. ISSUES NewArchived
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.853 | 0.772 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".