Le Fascinateur et la Bonne Presse : des médias catholiques pour publics francophones
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Fascinateur and « La Bonne Presse » : Catholic Media for Francophone Publics. Through a study of « La Bonne Presse » and its magazine Le Fascinateur (1903-1938), this paper sheds light on an unfamiliar aspect of France and Quebec's intertwining cinematic traditions. Important questions are raised regarding Catholic cinema and the relationship between the Catholic Church and film. « La Bonne Presse » participated actively in production (prints, magic lantern slides, films), marketing and even in the manufacturing of equipment. All these activities faced competition from secular groups in France who were equally involved in the film industry. The beliefs held by « La Bonne Presse », as well as its productions, also existed in Quebec, where the Catholic Church was concerned with overpowering the Free Masons. As a result, « Le Bon Cinéma National » was founded in 1907. This company focused on the diffusion of moral or religious films, frequently distributing exactly the same programs as « La Bonne Presse ». Certain individuals demanded even stricter censorship. This paper demonstrates that within their cinematic histories, France and Quebec do indeed share a common destiny and parallel ambitions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it