MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964499116 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2012.2187521

Cooperative Multiband Joint Detection With Correlated Spectral Occupancy in Cognitive Radio Networks

2012· article· en· W1964499116 on OpenAlexaff
Khalid Hossain, Benoı̂t Champagne, Ayman Assra

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive radioComputer scienceWidebandMarkov chainJoint (building)Interference (communication)Markov processFusion centerOccupancyMaximizationAlgorithmMathematical optimizationElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsMathematicsWirelessStatisticsEngineeringMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a frequency-coupled optimum linear energy combiner (OLEC) structure, recently proposed for single user scenarios, is generalized to multiple users and integrated into the spatial-spectral joint detection framework introduced by Quan , to take further advantage of subband occupancy correlation in cooperative wideband spectrum sensing. In particular, the design of the detection thresholds and fusion weights used by a bank of subband multiuser OLECs is formulated as a joint optimization problem, i.e. maximization of aggregate opportunistic throughput under interference constraints (or vice versa). Through numerical experiments with a Markov model of subband occupancy, the proposed scheme is shown to significantly enhance CR network performance in terms of these global metrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Signal ProcessingSame topicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum SensingFrench-language works237,207