Political and Social Values amid Reformation of the Society and the Electoral Law in Russia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article asserts that moral priorities and the categories of fairness and the good have historically been a characteristic trait of the Russian intellectual community. The constitutional provisions for the rule of the people in the Soviet era largely changed the worldview of the Russians, but the electoral practice, created a negative attitude towards the idea of the formation of government bodies and participation in this process. Complexities of renewal of the electoral law consisted in the fact that the Russian reformers tried to adapt the Western concepts of constitutional law to conditions of a post-communist state. The period of democratic transformation in Russia became the longest, most confrontational and vulnerable in comparison to other former socialist states. Effectively, while acknowledging international standards, no one in Russia was willing to obey those acting in the role of teaching missionaries. Formation of bodies of people power took place under low quality of electoral law norms, and what are most important-in complicated conditions of establishment of liberal values, which resulted in the fact that the process of their establishment caused rejection of the liberal values themselves and raised a crucial issue of implementation of moral principles, related to the electoral process
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".