MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964541012 · doi:10.1109/epec.2011.6070255

Improving passive solar collector for fiber optic lighting

2011· article· en· W1964541012 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Couture, Hafed Nabbus, Abdul Al-Azzawi, Monica Havelock

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsAlgonquin College
FundersOak Ridge National Laboratory
KeywordsDaylightingNonimaging opticsOptical fiberOpticsConcentratorIlluminanceComputer scienceDaylightEnvironmental scienceEngineeringPhysicsArchitectural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Increasing energy demand and cost are the main motivators for this research project, which utilizes solar radiation for lighting interior spaces in buildings. The objective is to use passive solar radiation collection coupled with fiber optic bundles to provide natural lighting. The research team proposes a novel passive fiber optic lighting system design, which collects the abundant supply of free solar radiation without using expensive tracking systems that require constant alignments year-round. The passive lighting system design will respond to several criteria. The exposed collector dome is fixed and capable of collecting as much light as possible on an average sunny day and robust to withstand all weather conditions. The fiber optic cable will deliver light up to 20 m or to the basement of a two story house; delivered light intensity must satisfy standard domestic lighting codes. The research focuses on two aspects of the system: the solar light collector and fiber optic distribution cables. In the initial project phase the dome of a commercially available tubular daylighting device is modified to enhance light collection. Preliminary tests indicate that it will be possible using gratings to redirect more sun rays into the tubular daylighting device, increasing the light captured. The next modification enables fiber optic bundles to be coupled to the system for light distribution to areas in a building. A parabolic mirror pair set-up as a compound concentrator inside the tubular daylighting device will concentrate light into the fiber bundle at the base.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207