MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964565039 · doi:10.2118/162784-ms

A Semi-analytical Model For Multi-stage Fractured Horizontal Wells

2012· article· en· W1964565039 on OpenAlexaff
Shanshan Yao, Fanhua Zeng, Hong Liu, Gang Zhao

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyFluid dynamicsPetroleum engineeringFlow (mathematics)MechanicsHorizontal planePermeability (electromagnetism)WellboreGeotechnical engineeringFracture (geology)Vertical planePressure dropEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Multi-stage fractured horizontal wells are widely applied to develop tight reservoirs and shale gas reservoirs. Testing and evaluating well productivity are necessary in horizontal well multi-stage fracturing. Through analyzing the post-fracturing transient pressure data, key parameters affecting the productivity, such as effective fracture lengths, fracture conductivities, fracture skin factors and average formation permeability, can be estimated. This paper presents a semi-analytical model based on Green’s function and source/sink method to facilitate the transient pressure analysis for a multi-stage fractured horizontal well in a closed box-shaped reservoir. The fluid flow for a multi-stage fractured horizontal well includes the fluid flowing from the reservoir to fractures, the fluid directly from the reservoir to the horizontal wellbore, fluid flow inside the fractures and fluid flow inside the horizontal wellbore. Compared with previous models, fluid flow directly from the reservoir to the horizontal wellbore and pressure drop caused by pipe flow inside the wellbore are considered. In this model, fractures and horizontal wellbore are discretized into vertical plane segments and horizontal line segments, respectively. The fluid flow from the reservoir to fracture and that directly from the reservoir to the horizontal wellbore at each segment are modeled based on analytical solutions of vertical plane source and horizontal line source, respectively. The fluid flow inside the fracture is modeled based on 1-D linear flow. The fluid flow inside the horizontal wellbore is described with Penmatcha and Aziz’s model (1999). Then, the flow equations are coupled together by using the flux- and pressure-continuity conditions on the interfaces. The effects of the fracture lengths, fracture conductivities and fracture skin factors on the transient pressure behavior are studied and type curves are generated. The results suggested that in a tight or shale-gas reservoir, the transient pressure behavior during a testing period is mainly dominated by fracture stages, fracture lengths, conductivities and skin factors. The fluid flow directly from the reservoir into the horizontal wellbore reduces the pressure drop slightly. A field case is analyzed and reliable results are obtained. This model can be applied to optimize the fracture spacing and fracture length for a multistage fractured horizontal well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Canadian Unconventional Resources ConferenceSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207