MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964579230 · doi:10.3917/ds.341.0049

Vicissitudes de l'identité sociale et allégations d'entorses aux lois chez un groupe de mormons polygames canadiens

2010· article· fr· W1964579230 on OpenAlexaffabout
Marie-Andrée Pelland, Dianne Casoni

Bibliographic record

VenueDéviance et Société · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion and Society Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les mormons fondamentalistes polygames font l’objet de nombreuses allégations de conduites contraires aux lois au Canada. Dans une recherche visant à étudier leurs réactions aux enquêtes menées par des agents de contrôle social, il est apparu que les vicissitudes de leur identité sociale jouaient un pôle important dans leurs stratégies de contact avec la société environnante. De plus, la décision de quitter leur groupe-mère à la suite de l’excommunication de leur leader, Winston Blackmore, a contribué à créer d’importantes pressions qui les ont conduits à une complète remise en question de leur identité sociale. L’analyse de données provenant d’entretiens avec des membres du groupe, d’échanges sur leur forum de discussion WEB et du journal de la communauté a permis d’identifier trois dimensions principales de ce questionnement identitaire. Ces dimensions se comprennent comme autant de questions existentielles concernant leur rapport à la société qui les entoure. Ces dimensions seront présentées, illustrées d’extraits d’entretiens et d’échanges WEB, et discutées, notamment en regard des écrits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDéviance et SociétéSame topicReligion and Society InteractionsFrench-language works237,207