Carboxymethyl Cellulose:Polyvinylamine Complex Hydrogel Swelling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The swelling behavior of the polyelectrolyte complex films made from polyvinylamine (PVAm) or poly(vinylformamide- co -vinylamine) copolymers and carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) was studied as a function of polymer composition, pH, and salt concentration. Swelling is determined by the balance between ionic cross-link density, opposing swelling, with solvation and Donnan effects promoting swelling. Films containing excess ammonium groups gave the greatest swelling at low pH, whereas excess carboxyl groups enhanced swelling at high pH. Films with balanced charge stoichiometry (CMC:PVAm 3:1 w:w) gave the minimum swelling. High concentrations of sodium chloride increased swelling due to the decomposition (screening) of ionic cross-links, whereas calcium ion decreased swelling possibly because of calcium dicarboxylate cross-links. A simple swelling model based on the ionization behavior of dilute polymers and ionic cross-linking predicted the major swelling behaviors, including the effects of pH and polymer composition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".