MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964628598 · doi:10.3917/ris.073.0042

Le rôle de l'OTAN en Méditerranée et au Moyen-Orient

2009· article· fr· W1964628598 on OpenAlexaff
Brahim Saidy

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale et stratégique · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMiddle East and Rwanda Conflicts
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceAllianceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé L’OTAN a connu des changements majeurs pour s’adapter aux nouveaux enjeux sécuritaires mondiaux issus de la fin de la guerre froide. L’Alliance a étendu sa compétence géographique, devenant une alliance militaire mondiale. Afin de faire face aux menaces sécuritaires en Méditerranée et au Moyen-Orient, l’OTAN a lancé le Partenariat méditerranéen de l’OTAN (PMO) et l’Initiative de coopération d’Istanbul (ICI). Or, le développement de ces deux partenariats se heurte à la spécificité de la conflictualité régionale, aux intérêts divergents des Alliés, au conflit israélo-arabe et à la mauvaise image de l’OTAN dans le monde arabe. L’approfondissement du rôle de l’OTAN dans la région nécessite que l’Alliance se dote d’un support politique visant à dénouer les conflits régionaux et réévalue les mécanismes de coopération.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale et stratégiqueSame topicMiddle East and Rwanda ConflictsFrench-language works237,207