MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964681608 · doi:10.1109/isie.2010.5637594

Control of three-phase converters for grid-connected renewable energy systems using feedback linearization technique

2010· article· en· W1964681608 on OpenAlexaff
Masoud Karimi-Ghartemani, S. Ali Khajehoddin, Praveen Jain, Alireza Bakhshai

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)InductanceController (irrigation)Voltage sourceAC powerComputer scienceFeedback linearizationConvertersOperating pointLinearizationEngineeringElectronic engineeringVoltageNonlinear systemElectrical engineeringControl (management)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a control algorithm based on feedback linearization technique for grid-connected three-phase non-dispatchable distributed generation (DG) systems such as a wind or a solar based generator. The power electronic interface is a voltage source inverter (VSI) and the output low-pass filter is an inductance (L) or an inductance-capacitance-inductance (LCL) circuit. The control objectives are injection of quality active power to the grid, regulation of the dc-link voltage, and regulation of reactive power to their desired values in the presence of system uncertainties and disturbances. Unlike the conventional methods which linearize the equations to design a controller working at the operating point, the proposed method of this paper is based on using a set of state variables which makes the equations globally linear for all operating points. Moreover, the method completely decouples the reactive-power and dc-link voltage control loops. The design stage is simple and engages no trial and error in adjusting the controller gains. Simulation results are also provided to confirm analytical derivations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207