MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964691607 · doi:10.1159/000151693

Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: A Complex Multifaceted Disease

2008· review· en· W1964691607 on OpenAlexaff
Julien Magné, Mario Sénéchal, Jean G. Dumesnil, Philippe Pîbarot

Bibliographic record

VenueCardiology · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMitral regurgitationCardiologyMitral annulusInternal medicineCoronary artery diseaseMitral valve repairMitral valveDiseaseMyocardial infarctionConcomitantRisk stratificationSurgeryBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR) is a complex multifactorial disease that involves global and regional left ventricular remodeling as well as dysfunction and distortion of the components of the mitral valve including the chordae, annulus and leaflets. This is a frequent (13-59%) complication of myocardial infarction, which is associated with a poor prognosis. The suboptimal results obtained with the most commonly used surgical strategy, that is, restrictive annuloplasty combined with coronary artery bypass graft, emphasize the need to develop alternative or concomitant surgical techniques that directly target the causal mechanisms of the disease. A comprehensive assessment of mitral valve configuration and left ventricular geometry and function prior to surgery as well as an accurate quantification of MR severity at rest and during exercise may help improve patient risk stratification and better individualize the surgical strategy based on the patient's specific characteristics. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current state of knowledge with regard to the definition, prevalence, mechanisms, outcome and treatment of ischemic MR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations151
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCardiologySame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207