MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964717999 · doi:10.2118/149010-ms

Design of Solvent-Assisted SAGD Processes in Heterogeneous Reservoirs Using Hybrid Optimization Techniques

2011· article· en· W1964717999 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Unconventional Resources Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersSaudi Aramco
KeywordsSimulated annealingGenetic algorithmTaguchi methodsComputer scienceSolventProcess engineeringPetroleum engineeringMathematical optimizationMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceAlgorithmMathematicsEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Many Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) optimization studies published in the literature combined numerical simulation with graphical or analytical techniques for design and performance evaluation. There have been numerous efforts that integrated the simulation exercise with global optimization algorithms. Some studies focused on optimization of cumulative steam-to-oil ratio (cSOR) in SAGD by altering steam injection rates, while others focused on optimization of cumulative net energy-to-oil ratio (cEOR) in solvent-additive SAGD by altering injection pressures and fraction of solvent in the injection stream. Several studies also considered total project net present value calculation by changing total project area, capital cost intensities, solvent prices, and risk factors to determine the well spacing and drilling schedule. Optimization techniques commonly used in those studies were scattered search, simulated annealing, and genetic algorithm (GA). However, the applications of hybrid genetic algorithm were rarely found. In this paper, we focused on optimization of solvent-assisted SAGD using various GA implementations. In our models, hexane was selected to be co-injected with steam. The objective function, defined based on cumulative steam-oil ratio (cSOR) and recovery factor, was optimized by changing injection pressures, production pressures, and injected solvent-to-steam ratio. Techniques including orthogonal arrays (OA) for experimental design (e.g. Taguchi’s arrays) and proxy models for objective function evaluations were incorporated with the GA method to improve computational and convergence efficiency. Results from these hybrid approaches revealed that an optimized solution could be achieved with less CPU time (e.g. fewer number of iterations) compared to the conventional GA method. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted on the choice of proxy model to study the robustness of the proposed methods. To investigate the effects of heterogeneity in the design process, optimization of solvent-assisted SAGD was performed on various synthetic heterogeneous reservoir models of porosity, permeability, and shale distributions. Our results highlight the potential application of the proposed techniques in other solvent-enhanced heavy oil recovery processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.521
Threshold uncertainty score0.737

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it