Fracture in glassy polymers: a molecular modeling perspective
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Over the past 25 years, molecular modeling and simulations have provided important insights into the physics of deformation and fracture of glassy polymers. This review presents an overview of key results discussed in the context of experimentally observed polymer behavior. Both atomistic and coarse-grained polymer models have been used in different deformation protocols to study elastic properties, shear yielding, creep, physical aging, strain hardening and crazing. Simulations reproduce most of the macroscopic features of plasticity in polymer glasses such as stress-strain relations and creep response, and reveal information about the underlying atomistic processes. Trends of the shear yield stress with loading conditions, temperature and strain rate, and the atomistic dynamics under load have been systematically explored. Most polymers undergo physical aging, which leads to a history-dependent mechanical response. Simulations of strain hardening and crazing demonstrate the nature of polymer entanglements in the glassy state and the role of local plasticity and provide insight into the origin of fracture toughness of amorphous polymers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it