MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964719551 · doi:10.1117/12.732163

Characterization and excitation of a nano-scaled plasmonic coupler with co-directional phase and contra-directional power flow

2007· article· en· W1964719551 on OpenAlexaff
Yan Wang, K. Zeaiter, Amr S. Helmy, George V. Eleftheriades

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower dividers and directional couplersPlasmonSurface plasmon polaritonWaveguideOpticsExcitationHybrid couplerNanophotonicsMetamaterialMaterials scienceGratingPropagation constantOptoelectronicsCoupling (piping)Surface plasmonPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A nano-scaled coupled-waveguide coupler based on the guidance of surface plasmon-polaritons (SPPs) is proposed, designed and simulated at optical frequencies. The basic structure of the coupler comprises layered dielectric materials and thin silver films, which serve as two stacked nano-transmission lines to achieve broadside coupling. The key property of this design is that it operates based on the principle of contra-directional coupling between a left-handed and a right-handed guided wave, giving rise to supermodes that are characterized by complex-conjugate propagation constants (even in the absence of losses), where the attenuation constant signifies the rate of coupling instead of the conventional power dissipation. The resulting exponential attenuation along the coupler leads to dramatically reduced coupling lengths compared to previously reported co-directional SPP couplers (e.g. from millimeters to sub-microns). Given its size, the device lends itself to form the building block of a functional matrix such as a switching array in nanophotonics applications, for example. In order to verify the contra-directional coupling theory and to characterize our design, we also propose and examine several possible excitation schemes, such as using a plasmonic dipole antenna and a grating structure to excite the SPP mode. Additionally, a measurement topology utilizing a curved plasmonic waveguide is also presented in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon ResearchFrench-language works237,207