MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964724793 · doi:10.4161/auto.7.5.15056

Direct and indirect effects of the pRb tumor suppressor on autophagy

2011· article· en· W1964724793 on OpenAlex
Giovanni Ciavarra, Eldad Zacksenhaus

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAutophagy · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutophagyMyogenesisBiologyCell biologySuppressorCell cycleProgrammed cell deathIntracellularCancer researchMyocyteCellCancerApoptosisGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autophagy, an intracellular degradation pathway involved in cell survival or demise, is tightly controlled by complex regulatory mechanisms. A link between the Rb tumor suppressor and autophagy is now emerging. pRb plays a critical role in cell cycle progression and survival as well as the differentiation of certain cell types. Recently, we have reported that during skeletal myogenesis, Rb-deficient myoblasts fuse to form short myotubes that quickly degenerate. Myotube degeneration was associated with increased autophagic flux and inhibition of autophagy rescued the defect leading to long, twitching myotubes. We propose that Rb-loss sensitizes cells to autophagy via direct and indirect mechanisms and we discuss how these might affect cancer progression and response to chemotherapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.641

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it