Three-dimensional ground displacements from static pipe bursting in stiff clay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three-dimensional ground surface displacements from 20 m long static pipe-bursting experiments are reported. These experiments were conducted with firm-to-stiff clay backfill in a trench with very stiff clay sidewalls at three different burial depths. Multiple digital cameras and image analysis were used to quantify the surface response as the expander progressed through the original pipe. The experiments quantified the upward surface movement as the expander approached, the effect of burial depth on maximum uplift, and the final amount of uplift after it decreased to a residual displacement. The experiments also quantified the axially forward ground surface movement as the expander approached, reaching maximum just ahead of the expander, and decreasing to almost zero after the expander had passed by. Lateral movements of the ground surface away from the centreline are also reported, which were essentially zero at the centre line, increasing to a maximum and then decreasing with distance from the centreline. The three different burial depths produced in effect the same width of vertical surface response with the displacements contained within 1.5 m on either side of the centreline, suggesting that the very stiff clay trench walls had a dominant influence on the measured displacements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".