MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964748063 · doi:10.1063/1.1287336

Dipole-induced ordering in nematic liquid crystals. II. The elusive holy grail

2000· article· en· W1964748063 on OpenAlexaff
Raymond T. Syvitski, E. Elliott Burnell

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLiquid Crystal Research Advancements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolarizabilityLiquid crystalDipoleQuadrupoleElectric fieldChemical physicsChemistryElectric field gradientRange (aeronautics)Condensed matter physicsMoleculeMolecular physicsMaterials sciencePhysicsAtomic physicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Similar size and shape molecules with different electric multipoles are used to investigate effects of molecular dipole, quadrupole, and polarizability interactions on the average orientational order of solutes in nematic liquid crystals. Solutes are codissolved in the same sample tube so that the orientational ordering among solutes can be directly compared and analyzed using mean-field models. Permanent dipoles have a negligible influence on solute orientational order. Effects from molecular polarizability interactions could not be separated from short-range interactions. However, order parameters predicted from strong, short-range repulsive forces coupled with interactions between the solute quadrupole and the average electric field gradient felt by the solute are consistent with experimental values. For the nematic mixture 55 wt% ZLI 1132 in EBBA [N-(pethoxybenzylidene)-p′-n-butylaniline] the contribution to solute ordering from long-range electrostatic interactions is negligible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicLiquid Crystal Research AdvancementsFrench-language works237,207