Inhibitory Actions of a Somatostatin Analog SMS 201-995 on Endocrine Secretion from the Isolated Perfused Stomach and Pancreas of the Rat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An analog of somatostatin, SMS 201-995 (SMS; Sandostatin), has been shown to have increased potency in the inhibition of hormone secretion in vivo. In this study, the effect of SMS on the secretion of immunoreactive insulin, gastrin and gastric somatostatin was examined in the rat using in situ vascularly perfused organ preparations. The analog was found to inhibit both basal somatostatin and gastrin secretion from the perfused stomach in a concentration-dependent manner. SMS (9.4 x 10(-8) mol/l) also inhibited somatostatin release stimulated by gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), but did not suppress gastrin release under the same conditions; an opposite effect was obtained when l-isoproterenol was used to stimulate somatostatin release. In the perfused pancreas both SS-14 (6.1 x 10(-9) mol/l) and SMS (9.4 x 10(-9) mol/l) inhibited the GIP (2 x 10(-9) mol/l) or acetylcholine (1 x 10(-6) mol/l), but not 17.8 x 10(-9) mol/l glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Insulin secretion stimulated by 17.8 x 10(-3) mol/l glucose was unaffected by either peptide at this concentration. These results show that SMS is a potent inhibitor of gastric and pancreatic endocrine secretion. However, the inhibitory effect of SMS on gastric endocrine secretion was uncoupled in the presence of different secretagogues, suggesting that the action of SMS was dependent on the activation of different mechanisms or pathways in the stomach. In the pancreas, SMS appears to be acting on the beta-cell via a similar mechanism as somatostatin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".