MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964767849 · doi:10.1063/1.1352056

Plasma induced smoothing of a spatially incoherent laser beam and reduction of backward stimulated Brillouin scattering

2001· article· en· W1964767849 on OpenAlexafffund
A. V. Maximov, Ivan Ourdev, D. Pesme, W. Rozmus, V. T. Tikhonchuk, C. E. Capjack

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Plasmas · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsOpticsBrillouin scatteringSpeckle patternPlasmaLaserScatteringBeam (structure)Laser linewidthAtomic physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The angular divergence and spectral bandwidth of a spatially incoherent laser beam propagating in an underdense plasma are shown to correspond to additional spatial and temporal incoherence in the regime where the average laser intensity in a speckle approaches the self-focusing threshold. The transverse and longitudinal sizes of laser speckles inside the plasma are related in a way that makes it possible to define a local effective beam f-number. The effective f-number decreases as light propagates through the plasma, and the effective f-number at the outgoing boundary is consistent with the transmitted light angular spreading. The spectral broadening and red shift of the transmitted light are interpreted as a result of multiple near-forward stimulated Brillouin scattering of the propagating laser beam. The reduction of backward stimulated Brillouin scattering follows from decrease of the effective speckle length and from the plasma induced temporal incoherence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of PlasmasSame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207