MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964781404 · doi:10.1021/ja0376240

[60]Fullerene-Containing Polyurethane Films with Large Ultrafast Nonresonant Third-Order Nonlinearity at Telecommunication Wavelengths

2003· article· en· W1964781404 on OpenAlexaff
Kuang Li, Qiying Chen, Edward H. Sargent, Zhi Yuan Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFullerene Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryFullereneRefractive indexUltrashort pulseWavelengthPolymerConjugated systemDerivative (finance)PolyurethaneKerr effectOptoelectronicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Nonlinear systemPolymer chemistryOpticsOrganic chemistryMaterials sciencePhysicsLaserQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A significantly enhanced, ultrafast third-order optical nonlinearity at the wavelengths of 1150-1600 nm was demonstrated with cross-linked C60-containing polyurethane films using the Z-scan technique. Good-quality polymer films with a high loading of C60 derivative were obtained by cross-linking of the hydroxyl-containing C60 derivative and a triisocyanate. The positive Kerr coefficient with nonresonant nonlinear refractive index n2 falls in the range of (3.7 +/- 0.80) x 10-4 to (2.0 +/- 0.6) x 10-3 cm2/GW, and the calculated chi(3) and gamma values are up to 9.7 x 10-11 and 9.6 x 10-32 esu at 1550 nm, which are several orders of enhancement in third-order optical nonlinearity over pristine C60 in solution and 1-2 orders of enhancement over recently reported C60 derivatives and conjugated polymers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations84
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicFullerene Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207