Multi-objective MTC device controller resource optimization in M2M communication
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Machine to machine (M2M) communication has received increasing attention in recent years. It exhibits features such as large number of devices and low data rates. In order to accommodate massive, energy efficient M2M traffic and to reduce the access delay and signalling overhead, the recommendation is to introduce a clustered network structure. In this effort, we consider machines (or devices) in a macro cell divided into clusters. The machines belonging to a cluster communicate to the cluster head/controller, which then aggregates the traffic and relays to the eNB. Unlike related work that focuses on formation of clusters and their energy consumption, in this paper we investigate the multi-objective optimization problem of throughput maximization and power control of cluster heads in interference-limited M2M communication. Our objective is to maximize the number of admitted MTC device controllers with least interference caused to conventional (human) devices such that their quality of service (QoS) is not affected by the M2M communications. To maximize the number of machines that can communicate while meeting the interference constraints of human devices and machines themselves, we formulate a mixed-integer non-linear programming (MINLP) problem. OPTI toolbox is used to optimize the power, capacity and maximum number of admitted machines collectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it