MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964809435 · doi:10.1115/1.1901707

Synthesis of the Base Curves For N-Lobed Elliptical Gears

2004· article· en· W1964809435 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mechanical Design · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvolutePressure angleRackBase (topology)Envelope (radar)GeometryRADIUSCycloid gearInvolute gearDifferential geometryDifferential (mechanical device)Euler's formulaMathematicsEngineeringStructural engineeringMathematical analysisMechanical engineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Motivated by the need to synthesize the tooth profiles of noncircular gears, we approach the synthesis of the tooth profile of circular spur gears using their pitch circle, rather than their base circle. We do this by means of envelope theory. The proposed formulation gives the involute tooth profile and its well-known base circle for any pitch radius and profile angle of the rack cutter, which coincides with the pressure angle for circular gears. Then, the foregoing approach applies to the synthesis of the base curves of noncircular gears with involute tooth profiles and of their rack. We do this by resorting to basic differential geometry using the Euler–Savary Theorem, rather than to envelope theory. In particular, the formulation of both base curves for the right and left involute tooth profiles is obtained, for the first time, for N-lobed elliptical gears and their rack through the formulation of the pitch curves and their evolutes. The proposed formulation is illustrated with numerical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.219

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it