MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964822014 · doi:10.1002/eji.200737189

Critical role for IFN‐γ in natural killer cell‐mediated protection from diabetes

2007· article· en· W1964822014 on OpenAlexaff
I‐Fang Lee, Huilian Qin, John J. Priatel, Rusung Tan

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Immunology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Cell Function and Interaction
Canadian institutionsChild and Family Research InstituteBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNodNOD miceImmunologyBiologyCytotoxic T cellSecretionInterleukin 12CytotoxicityInterleukin 21SpleenAdjuvantDiabetes mellitusT cellImmune systemEndocrinologyIn vitro

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autoimmune diabetes in nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice can be prevented by a single injection of complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA), but the mechanisms mediating protection remains unclear. We previously showed that NOD mice immunized with CFA have a markedly reduced incidence of diabetes that is associated with a significant decrease in the number of beta-cell-specific, autoreactive cytotoxic T lymphocytes and, furthermore, that the effect of CFA is mediated by natural killer (NK) cells. In this study, we report one mechanism by which NK cells regulate the onset of diabetes. Administration of CFA produced a rapid increase in NK cell frequency and function, including cytotoxicity and IFN-gamma secretion. By co-transferring NK cells from IFN-gamma-deficient (or wild-type) NOD mice and spleen cells from diabetic NOD mice to NOD/SCID recipients, we show that IFN-gamma secretion by NK cells significantly influences the effect of CFA protection. In contrast, NK cytotoxicity does not appear to participate in CFA-mediated protection from diabetes. Our findings demonstrate that NK cells mediate the protective effects of CFA through secretion of IFN-gamma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.462
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of ImmunologySame topicImmune Cell Function and InteractionFrench-language works237,207