A Novel Thiol-Modified Hyaluronan and Elastin-Like Polypetide Composite Material for Tissue Engineering of the Nucleus Pulposus of the Intervertebral Disc
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical, in vitro, and initial in vivo evaluation of a thiol-modified hyaluronan (TM-HA) and elastin-like polypeptide (ELP) composite hydrogel for nucleus pulposus (NP) tissue engineering. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the utility of a TM-HA and ELP composite material as a potential tissue-engineering scaffold to reconstitute the NP in early degenerative disc disease (DDD) on the basis of both biomechanical and biologic parameters. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: DDD is a common ailment with enormous medical, psychosocial, and economic ramifications. Only end-stage surgical therapies are currently widely available. A less invasive, early stage therapy may provide a clinically relevant treatment option. METHODS: TM-HA and ELP were combined in various concentrations and cross-linked using poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate. Resulting materials were evaluated biomechanically using confined compression to determine biphasic material properties. In vitro cell culture with human intervertebral disc (IVD) cells seeded within TM-HA/ELP scaffolds was analyzed for cell viability and phenotype. The hydrogels' materials were evaluated in an established New Zealand White (NZW) rabbit model of DDD. RESULTS: The addition of ELP to TM-HA-based hydrogels resulted in a stiffer construct, which is less stiff than native NP but has time-dependant loading characteristics that may be desirable when injected into the IVD. In vitro experiments demonstrated 70% cell viability at 3 weeks with apparent maintenance of phenotype on the basis of morphologic and immunohistochemical data. The addition of ELP had a positive desirable biomechanical effect but did not have a significant positive or negative biologic effect on cell activity. The in vivo feasibility study demonstrated favorable material characteristics and biocompatibility for application as a minimally invasive injectable NP supplement. CONCLUSIONS: TM-HA-based hydrogels provide a hospitable environment for human IVD cells and have material characteristics, particularly when supplemented with ELPs that are attractive for potential application as an injectable NP supplement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".