MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964843655 · doi:10.1021/ja207538g

Preparation of RSn(I)–Sn(I)R with Two Unsymmetrically Coordinated Sn(I) Atoms and Subsequent Gentle Activation of P<sub>4</sub>

2011· article· en· W1964843655 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Shabana Khan, Reent Michel, Johannes M. Dieterich, Ricardo A. Mata, Herbert W. Roesky, Jean‐Philippe Demers, Adam Lange, Dietmar Stalke

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compounds
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDanmarks GrundforskningsfondDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsChemistryWhite PhosphorusCrystallographyBond lengthTinSingle bondStereochemistryPhosphorusCrystal structureGroup (periodic table)Organic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article reports the reduction of [{2,6-iPr(2)C(6)H(3)NC(CH(3))}(2)C(6)H(3)SnCl] (1) with potassium graphite to afford a new distannyne [{2,6-iPr(2)C(6)H(3)NC(CH(3))}(2)C(6)H(3)Sn](2) (2) with a Sn-Sn bond. The most striking phenomenon of 2 is the presence of two differently coordinated Sn atoms (one is three-coordinated, the other is four-coordinated). The Sn-Sn bond length in 2 is 2.8981(9) Å, which is very close to that of a Sn-Sn single bond (2.97-3.06 Å). To elucidate the nature of the Sn-Sn bond, DFT calculation is carried out that shows there is no multiple bond character in 2. Furthermore, the reaction of 2 with white P(4) affords the tetraphosphabicylobutane derivative 3. This is the first example of gentle activation of white phosphorus by a compound with low valent Sn atoms. Note that, unlike 2, in 3 both Sn atoms are four-coordinated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations117
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicSynthesis and characterization of novel inorganic/organometallic compoundsFrench-language works237,207