MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Development of a Postpartum Depression Best Practice Guideline

2007· review· en· W1964853308 on OpenAlexaffabout
Karen McQueen, Cindy‐Lee Dennis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nursing Care Quality · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical practice guidelines implementation
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThunderBayGuidelineNursingLibrary scienceMedicineHistoryGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The School of Nursing, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay (Ms McQueen), and the University of Toronto, Toronto (Dr Dennis), Ontario, Canada. Corresponding Author: Karen McQueen, MA, RN, School of Nursing, Lakehead University, 955 Oliver Rd, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada P7B 5E3 ([email protected]). Accepted for publication: February 13, 2007

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.037
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.082
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.195

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0370.082
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.005
Bibliometrics0.0090.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0080.003
Research integrity0.0090.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.571
GPT teacher head0.668
Teacher spread0.097 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nursing Care QualitySame topicClinical practice guidelines implementationFrench-language works237,207