The effect of bilayer and hexagonal H<sub>II</sub> phase lipid films on transepidermal water loss
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The common membrane phospholipids tend to adopt either the familiar bilayer phase or the less familiar hexagonal H(II) phase when isolated and hydrated in excess water. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of these very different macroscopic lipid structures on transepidermal water loss (TEWL) when they are applied to the surface of pig skin mounted in Franz diffusion cells. First, a novel in vitro method for monitoring TEWL was developed and characterized in which the flux of water from the subphase through skin was measured through the absorption of (3H)-water by lyophilized polyethylene glycol (PEG) mounted above the skin surface. TEWL was varied by disrupting the skin barrier to different degrees by tape stripping or solvent extraction. Bilayer-forming egg phosphatidylcholine (EPC) or hexagonal H(II)-forming dioleoyl phosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE) were applied topically as solutions in ethanol and subsequently dried to films. The molecular configuration adopted by each lipid at the skin surface was confirmed by phosphorus NMR. TEWL for normal skin was approximately 2 g H2O/h/m2, increasing to a maximum of 80 g H2O/h/m2 after the stratum corneum was completely removed by tape stripping. On tape-stripped skin, films of lipid doses as low as 10 mg/cm2 significantly reduced TEWL, and DOPE (hexagonal H(II)) was approximately twofold more effective than EPC (bilayer). Furthermore, the effects of EPC and Vaseline on reducing TEWL from damaged skin were readily reversed by a simple aqueous wash, whereas the DOPE effect was unaltered even by vigorous washing. Similar results were obtained with lipid films applied to solvent-extracted skin. The data are consistent with the formation of extensive hydrophobic interactions between the skin and the outwardly facing acyl chains of the inverted, hexagonal H(II) phase adopted by DOPE. This results in the formation of a durable surface barrier capable of significantly reducing TEWL from damaged skin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".