MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964894970 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2005.843604

A multiband /spl Delta//spl Sigma/ fractional-N frequency synthesizer for a MIMO WLAN transceiver RFIC

2005· article· en· W1964894970 on OpenAlexaff
John Rogers, Fa Foster Dai, M. Cavin, D.G. Rahn

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in PLL and VCO Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrequency synthesizerPhase-locked loopPhase noiseDelta-sigma modulationElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringTransmitterTransceiverPhysicsEngineeringCMOS

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents a shared fractional-N synthesizer used by two dual-band 802.11 radios integrated on a single chip for 2/spl times/2 multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) applications. Additional 2/spl times/2 MIMO chips can be used in a system by phase synchronizing the signal paths through a bidirectional LO porting scheme developed for this application. This synthesizer was fully integrated with the exception of an off-chip loop filter. The synthesizer is a /spl Delta//spl Sigma/-based fractional-N frequency synthesizer with three on-chip LC tuned VCOs to cover the entire frequency bands specified in the IEEE 802.11a/b/g and Japanese WLAN standards. The radio uses a variable IF frequency so that both the RF LO and IF LO can be derived from a single synthesizer saving chip area and power. The synthesizer includes a programmable second/third-order /spl Delta//spl Sigma/ noise shaper, a phase frequency detector, a differential charge pump, and a 6-bit multimodulus divider (MMD). The nominal jitter from 100 Hz to 10 MHz is 0.63-0.86/spl deg/ rms in the 5-GHz band and 0.35-0.43/spl deg/ rms in the 2.4-GHz band. The maximum frequency deviation of the synthesizer when enabling the transmitter is less than 150 kHz and the frequency error settles to 2 kHz in less than 12 /spl mu/s. For MIMO applications requiring more than two full paths, a single synthesizer on one die can be used to generate the LOs for all other radios integrated in different dies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Solid-State CircuitsSame topicAdvancements in PLL and VCO TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207