MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964897789 · doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9591524.0219

Cerebral ischemia disrupts the expression of regulators of synaptic cell adhesion in synaptosomes

2005· article· en· W1964897789 on OpenAlexaff
Willard J. Costain, Arsalan S. Haqqani, Ingrid Rasquinha, Edward Preston, Jaqueline Webster, Danica Stanimirovic

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Biological Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIschemiaNeuroscienceSynaptosomeCell biologyBrain ischemiaCell adhesionAdhesionChemistryCellBiologyMedicineCentral nervous systemInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dramatic and rapidly reversible structural changes are observed in dendritic spine morphology following excitotoxic or hypoxic stress1. However, morphological and biochemical alterations in post-synaptic densities persist for up to 24 hours following transient ischemia. This suggests that the synapse may be the origin of signals that propagate toward the cell body and instigate delayed post-ischemic neuronal death. Synaptically localized cell adhesion molecules are important regulators of synaptic plasticity and synaptogenesis. Regulation of cell adhesion and cytoskeletal structure in dendritic spines is necessary for the maintenance of mature synaptic connections. Therefore, we examined the effects of transient cerebral ischemia on the expression of synaptic proteins 20 hours post-ischemia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & MetabolismSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207