MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964919724 · doi:10.14419/ijac.v2i1.1531

Biosorption of Ni (II) from aqueous solution using Acer saccharum leaves (ASL) as a potential sorbent

2013· article· en· W1964919724 on OpenAlexafffund
DR.Hemakrishna Ravuri, W.B. Gilbert

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Advanced Chemistry · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsBiosorptionSorbentAdsorptionChemistryAqueous solutionFreundlich equationNuclear chemistryLangmuir adsorption modelLangmuirMetal ions in aqueous solutionMetalSorptionOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this research work Powder of Acer Saccharum Leaves (PASL) were used as a non-conventional, cost-effective sorbent for removal of Ni (II) from aqueous solutions in batch systems. The sorbent was characterised with respect to surface area, pore volume, etc. It was found that PASL has high specific surface area (11.99 m2/g) and contains Ni (II) binding functional groups (e.g. Hydroxyl and Carboxyl).The biosorbent was characterized by FTIR, SEM and X-ray mapping, and the powder surface area was determined by BET. The optimum biosorption conditions were determined as a function of pH, biomass dosage, contact time, and initial metal ion concentration. The maximum Ni (II) biosorption was obtained at pH 4.0. The equilibrium data were better fit by the Langmuir isotherm and Freundlich isotherm models. The kinetic studies indicate that the biosorption process of the metal ion Ni (II) has followed well the pseudo-second order, avrami and intraparticle diffusion models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Advanced ChemistrySame topicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalFrench-language works237,207