MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964928157 · doi:10.7202/058071ar

Le travail des aides familiales : Beaucoup de labeur, peu de valeur

2005· article· fr· W1964928157 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Ruth Rose

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches féministes · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les aides familiales, presque exclusivement des femmes, sont embauchées pour s'occuper d'enfants ou d'adultes malades, handicapés ou en perte d'autonomie et effectuer du travail ménager dans la résidence privée d'un employeur. Dans le contexte de la lutte de longue haleine de l'Association des aides familiales du Québec pour faire reconnaître ce travail et la qualification professionnelle exigée, la présente recherche a pour objet de mesurer le contenu de la tâche d'un échantillon diversifié de 22 aides familiales dont la plupart sont des immigrantes récentes venant de pays pauvres. Des données sur la formation et l'expérience de travail des aides familiales et sur la durée du temps de travail sont confrontées à l'information obtenue sur les salaires et les conditions de travail pour confirmer l'hypothèse selon laquelle le travail d'aide familiale est sous-évalué.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches féministesSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207