Direct Evidence of the Role of ATPγS in the Binding of Single-Stranded Binding Protein (<i>Escherichia coli)</i> and RecA to Single-Stranded DNA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To gain insight into the influence of ATPγS on the competitive binding of RecA and single-stranded binding protein (SSB) on single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), AFM imaging was used to examine the three-dimensional structures of the different complexes formed by the binding of the two proteins on ssDNA in the presence and absence of ATPγS. In the presence of ATPγS, RecA attaches to ssDNA, displacing SSB, to form continuous binding regions that caused considerable elongation of the strand. When ATPγS is absent, RecA could not compete with SSB and only binds at a few sites that correspond to the vacancy in ssDNA left when SSB unbinds. These results provide direct evidence that, while SSB binding affinity to DNA is substantially higher than that of RecA, the presence of ATPγS is sufficient to alter the events and enable RecA coating of DNA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".