The functional equation truncation method for approximating slow invariant manifolds: A rapid method for computing intrinsic low-dimensional manifolds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A slow manifold is a low-dimensional invariant manifold to which trajectories nearby are rapidly attracted on the way to the equilibrium point. The exact computation of the slow manifold simplifies the model without sacrificing accuracy on the slow time scales of the system. The Maas-Pope intrinsic low-dimensional manifold (ILDM) [Combust. Flame 88, 239 (1992)] is frequently used as an approximation to the slow manifold. This approximation is based on a linearized analysis of the differential equations and thus neglects curvature. We present here an efficient way to calculate an approximation equivalent to the ILDM. Our method, called functional equation truncation (FET), first develops a hierarchy of functional equations involving higher derivatives which can then be truncated at second-derivative terms to explicitly neglect the curvature. We prove that the ILDM and FET-approximated (FETA) manifolds are identical for the one-dimensional slow manifold of any planar system. In higher-dimensional spaces, the ILDM and FETA manifolds agree to numerical accuracy almost everywhere. Solution of the FET equations is, however, expected to generally be faster than the ILDM method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".