Capillary electrophoresis of histone H1 variants at neutral pH in dynamically modified fused- silica tubing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Existing methods for the analysis of histone H1 by capillary electrophoresis (CE) employ acidic buffers (pH <3.0) to suppress silanol ionization and minimize the loss of these extremely basic proteins by adsorption to capillary walls. Here we describe the use of Polybrene (PB) as a dynamic modification reagent in a simple procedure that facilitates the analysis of chicken H1 at neutral pH. PB is adsorbed to the inner surfaces of capillaries to render them cationic prior to use and a low concentration of PB is included in the electrolyte to replenish the coating during use. Inclusion of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) in the electrolyte results in the assembly of a dynamic cation-exchange layer upon the immobilized PB that influences the relative mobilities of H1 variants. The six nonallelic variants of H1 known in this species as well as certain allelic variants are resolved. Because the procedure is effective in preventing the adsorption of proteins as basic as H1 at neutral pH, this strategy should facilitate CE analyses of many basic proteins under conditions that maintain their native conformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".