Le développement durable en Afrique : un processus sous contraintes Expérience de l’industrie minière malienne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le concept de développement durable a émergé des revendications environnementales mais s’inscrit également dans le prolongement des débats sur le développement et la revendication d’une autre mondialisationbasée sur des modèles de développement alternatifs. Vu de cette manière, il peut sembler hors de propos d’aborder la question du développement durable dans le contexte des pays africains sous ajustement structurel depuis environ 25 ans. En effet, les politiques macro-économiques caractérisant ces programmes limitent la marge de manœuvre des États dans la définition des politiques. Cependant, le concept de développement durable a permis l’émergence d’un espace de communication sur la base de principes et valeurs telles que la responsabilité, la précaution et la participation, qui sont mobilisés par divers acteurs sociaux, favorisant ainsi l’expression de propositions alternatives jusqu’ici socialement inaudibles. L’industrie minière malienne expérimente ce potentiel de mobilisation du développement durable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".