MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965035886 · doi:10.1159/000231946

Pharmacologic Profile of a New Antiallergic Compound PRD-92-Ea

2009· article· en· W1965035886 on OpenAlexaff
Judy El-Azab, Brian R. Stewart

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Archives of Allergy and Applied Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSynthesis of Organic Compounds
Canadian institutionsPurdue Pharma (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBronchoconstrictionCompound 48/80HistamineDegranulationPharmacologyMast cellOvalbuminImmunologyPotencyMedicineBradykininChemistrySerotoninAsthmaAntigenInternal medicineIn vitroBiochemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PRD-92-Ea [5,5-Dimethyl-11-oxo-5H, 11H-(2) benzopyrano (4,3-g) (1) benzopyran-9-carboxylic acid ethanolamine], was an active antiallergic compound in rat and monkey experimental models of immediate hypersensitivity. It inhibited, in a dose-dependent manner, the rat PCA reaction after both intravenous and oral administration. It also inhibited the degranulation of rat peritoneal mast cells after antigenic challenge. PRD-92-Ea was also active in preventing bronchoconstriction in Ascaris-sensitive Rhesus monkeys after intravenous, topical and oral administration. Using chopped monkey tissues, it was found that PRD-92-Ea prevented histamine release from the respiratory mast cells, but not from the cutaneous mast cells. No reason for this dichotomy of effect is known. PRD-92-Ea showed antagonistic activity against the allergic mediators released from mast cells. In order of decreasing potency it was active against SRS-A (monkey lung), PGF2alpha, PGE2, serotonin, bradykinin and histamine. Apart from its antiallergic effects PRD-92-Ea had no other significant pharmacological activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Archives of Allergy and Applied ImmunologySame topicSynthesis of Organic CompoundsFrench-language works237,207