MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965065348 · doi:10.1080/07373930801944762

Complex Dielectric Properties of the Sapwood of Aspen, White Birch, Yellow Birch, and Sugar Maple

2008· article· en· W1965065348 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueDrying Technology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsService de Recherche et d'EXpertise en Transformation des Produits ForestiersUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsWater contentMapleSugarDielectricMoistureYellow birchMicrowaveMaterials scienceBotanyDielectric heatingComposite materialHorticultureChemistryBiologyFood scienceOptoelectronics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dielectric properties of four Canadian eastern wood species were measured as a function of moisture content and temperature, at frequencies between 0.4 and 2.47 GHz using the cavity perturbation technique. The temperature was varied from − 20 to 58°C and moisture content from 40 to 136%. Dielectric properties varied with moisture content, wood temperature, and microwave frequency. However, the influence of moisture content and microwave frequency overshadowed the influence of wood species and wood temperature. The dependencies were established for the selected species and discrepancies are discussed, namely concerning their implication when used in wood industry (nondestructive testing, heating, and drying).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it