Olmsted Syndrome?Palmoplantar and Periorificial Keratodermas: Association with Malignant Melanoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Olmsted syndrome is a rare congenital disorder with mutilating palmoplantar keratoderma, periorificial keratotic plaques, and other variable features. OBJECTIVE: We describe a 65-year-old woman with Olmsted syndrome complicated by the occurrence of a malignant melanoma inside the plantar keratoderma. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of such an occurrence in Olmsted syndrome. The published cases of this rare disorder are reviewed. CONCLUSION: An association between malignant epithelial tumors and Olmsted syndrome has already been reported. The association of malignant melanoma with other types of palmoplantar keratodermas has been reported. This may suggest a predisposition to melanocytic as well as squamous cell malignancies in congenital keratodermas. Oral retinoids appear to be the most promising treatment for Olmsted syndrome and for other symptomatic keratodermas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".