La Convention-cadre pour la lutte anti-tabac : espoir pour l'Afrique ?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
African countries have a lot to gain from the first international public health treaty. The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) was adopted in May 2003 by 168 member countries at the World Health Assembly. The African delegation demonstrated and put forth a strong, united front throughout the series of sessions which comprised the negotiation process. There are a number of considerable obstacles and challenges particular to this region of the world which makes it difficult to put tobacco control on the African agenda. Only a solid civil society mobilisation movement could serve as a worthy adversary to take on such a challenge. NGOs, such as the Framework Convention Alliance, provide assistance and should continue to support the activities of some of the key players who are still working in isolation on the continent. These organisations can also play a vital role by continuing to favour the provision of access to the available data and information which only exists in English so that the language barrier no longer remains a hindrance to the protection of the health of citizens in Francophone African countries.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it