A New Emulsified Acid to Stimulate Deep Wells In Carbonate Reservoirs: Coreflood and Acid Reaction Studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Acid treatments in high temperature deep wells drilled in carbonate reservoirs represent a challenge to the oil industry. The high temperature of deep wells requires a special formulation of emulsified acid that can be stable and effective at such high temperatures. At these high temperatures, both the reaction rate between acid and rock, and corrosion rate of tubulars are high. This fact makes protection of tubulars and reducing the reaction rate between rock and acid challenging. A new emulsifier was used to prepare emulsified acids that can be used in stimulating deep wells drilled in carbonate reservoirs. All emulsified acid systems were formulated at 0.7 acid volume fraction, and the final HCl concentration was 15 wt%. A coreflood study was conducted in order to study the efficiency of the new emulsified acid to create wormholes, and to increase the efficiency of the stimulation treatment. Both low and high permeability Indiana limestone cores were used in the present study. The effect of acid injection rate, rock permeability, and emulsifier concentration on the performance of emulsified acid systems were studied. The reaction between emulsified acid and limestone rocks was studied using a rotating disk apparatus at 230 ºF, and rotational speeds up to 1,500 rpm. The results showed, for both low and high permeability Indiana limestone cores, the new emulsified acid system created deep wormholes at all injection rates (0.5 to 10 cm3/min), with no face dissolution encountered during acid injection. The reaction rate between the new emulsified acid and limestone cores was measured using a rotating disk at 230 ºF. The dissolution rate increased as the rotational speed increased, indicating that reaction between emulsified acid and limestone is a mass transfer limited reaction. Both reaction rate and diffusion rate decreased as the emulsifier concentration increased from 0.5 to 2.0 vol%. From these results, the new emulsifier can be used in formulating emulsified acid systems that can be used effectively in stimulation of high temperature deep wells. This paper summarizes the results of testing the new emulsified system, and recommends its use for field application in deep carbonate reservoirs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".