MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965121657 · doi:10.2109/jcersj2.117.604

Ferroelectric properties of direct-patternable La substituted Bi4Ti3O12 thin films formed by photochemical metal-organic deposition

2009· article· en· W1965121657 on OpenAlexaff
Hyeong‐Ho Park, Hong‐Sub Lee, Hyung‐Ho Park, Ross H. Hill, Yun Taek Hwang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Ceramic Society of Japan · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrostructureFerroelectricityMaterials scienceThin filmPolarization (electrochemistry)MetalDeposition (geology)Chemical engineeringComposite materialNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsDielectricMetallurgyPhysical chemistryChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The surface microstructure and ferroelectric properties of direct-patternable Bi4-xLaxTi3O12 (BLT) films prepared by photochemical metal-organic deposition as a function of La contents were characterized. The surface microstructure showed that La substitution (x = 0.75 and 1.00) to Bi4Ti3O12 films was effective to induce an improved microstructure of the BLT films without the formation of surface holes. The measured remnant polarization values of BLT films with x = 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 were 3.7, 7.1, 11.3, 16.0, and 8.1 μC/cm2, respectively. After 109 cycles, the remaining remnant polarizations of Bi4-xLaxTi3O12 films with x = 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 were 64.9, 69.5, 75.9, 94.8, and 95.0%, respectively. Considering the surface microstructure and ferroelectric properties of the BLT films, the BLT film with x = 0.75 showed the best microstructure and ferroelectric properties among all the BLT films. These results suggest the possible application of ferroelectric BLT film, relatively easily and without high cost process such as dry etching.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.593

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Ceramic Society of JapanSame topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207