MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965130259 · doi:10.1080/13602365.2012.659896

Critical perspectives on landscape: Introduction

2012· article· en· W1965130259 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Architecture · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLandscape and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)ArchitectureArt historyPlan (archaeology)SociologyArtHistoryVisual artsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Acknowledgements The guest editors would like to thank Murray Fraser and Eugénie Shinkle for their advisory role at various stages of this project, and all the referees who contributed to the peer review. Notes J. Wylie, Landscape (London, Routedge, 2007), p. 1. H. Lefebvre, The Production of Space (Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell,1991). The Conference was jointly organised by Krystallia Kamvasinou and Davide Deriu (School of Architecture and the Built Environment) together with Eugénie Shinkle (School of Media Art and Design). Keynote speakers were Gabriele Basilico, Stephen Daniels, Christophe Girot and Jonathan Hill. See http://emerginglandscapes.org.uk/ A Retrospective Symposium on the Architectural Review's Townscape Campaign, organised by the ATCH research centre at the University of Queensland and the UCL Bartlett School of Architecture, took place in London in July, 2011. For a more detailed account of the eighteenth-century context please refer to essays by Hill, and Macarthur and Aitchison in this volume. For a more detailed account of the emergence of the plan and the role of the grid in the eighteenth century please refer to Lee's essay in this volume. See S. Crowe, The Landscape of Roads (London, The Architectural Press, 1960). See, for example, L. Halprin, Freeways (New York, Reinhold Pub. Corp., 1966). D. Appleyard, K. Lynch, J. R. Myer, The View from the Road (Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press, 1964), p. 63. Ibid. In 1997 John Brinkerhoff Jackson confirmed the crucial role of mobility in defining a new 'auto-vernacular' American landscape. By this he not only contributed to the discourse on future types of vernacular landscapes but also paved the way for a revival of the mobility discourse in the first decade of the twenty-first century. See J. B. Jackson, 'The future of the vernacular', in', P. Groth, T. W. Bressi, eds, Understanding Ordinary Landscapes (New Haven and London, Yale University Press, 1997), pp. 145–154. See, for example, the work of Carola Wingren in Sweden, Rodolphe Luscher in Switzerland, West 8 in the Netherlands, Bernard Lassus in France, Denton Corker Marshall, Wood Marsh Architects and PINK in Melbourne, Australia and the A13 Artscape (London) and M8 (Scotland) projects in the UK. N. Barley, Breathing Cities: The Architecture of Movement (Basel, Birkhäuser, 2000); M. Schwarzer, Zoomscape: architecture in motion and media (New York, Princeton Architectural Press, 2004); P. Wollen and J. Kerr, eds, Autopia: Car and Culture (London, Reaktion, 2002); M. Hvattum, B. Brenna, B. Elvebakk, J. Kampevold Larsen, eds, Routes, Roads and Landscapes (Farnham, Ashgate, 2011). See J. T. Schnapp, ed., Speed Limits (Milan, Skira, 2009), catalogue of the exhibition held at the CCA, Montréal; F. Houben and L. M. Calabrese, eds, Mobility: A room with a view (Rotterdam, NAi Publishers, 2003), edited volume accompanying the 1st International Architecture Biennale in Rotterdam. See C. Girot, 'Vision in Motion: Representing Landscape in Time', in, C. Waldheim, ed., The Landscape Urbanism Reader (New York, Princeton Architectural Press, 2006), pp. 87–103.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it