Critical perspectives on landscape: Introduction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Acknowledgements The guest editors would like to thank Murray Fraser and Eugénie Shinkle for their advisory role at various stages of this project, and all the referees who contributed to the peer review. Notes J. Wylie, Landscape (London, Routedge, 2007), p. 1. H. Lefebvre, The Production of Space (Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell,1991). The Conference was jointly organised by Krystallia Kamvasinou and Davide Deriu (School of Architecture and the Built Environment) together with Eugénie Shinkle (School of Media Art and Design). Keynote speakers were Gabriele Basilico, Stephen Daniels, Christophe Girot and Jonathan Hill. See http://emerginglandscapes.org.uk/ A Retrospective Symposium on the Architectural Review's Townscape Campaign, organised by the ATCH research centre at the University of Queensland and the UCL Bartlett School of Architecture, took place in London in July, 2011. For a more detailed account of the eighteenth-century context please refer to essays by Hill, and Macarthur and Aitchison in this volume. For a more detailed account of the emergence of the plan and the role of the grid in the eighteenth century please refer to Lee's essay in this volume. See S. Crowe, The Landscape of Roads (London, The Architectural Press, 1960). See, for example, L. Halprin, Freeways (New York, Reinhold Pub. Corp., 1966). D. Appleyard, K. Lynch, J. R. Myer, The View from the Road (Cambridge, Mass., The MIT Press, 1964), p. 63. Ibid. In 1997 John Brinkerhoff Jackson confirmed the crucial role of mobility in defining a new 'auto-vernacular' American landscape. By this he not only contributed to the discourse on future types of vernacular landscapes but also paved the way for a revival of the mobility discourse in the first decade of the twenty-first century. See J. B. Jackson, 'The future of the vernacular', in', P. Groth, T. W. Bressi, eds, Understanding Ordinary Landscapes (New Haven and London, Yale University Press, 1997), pp. 145–154. See, for example, the work of Carola Wingren in Sweden, Rodolphe Luscher in Switzerland, West 8 in the Netherlands, Bernard Lassus in France, Denton Corker Marshall, Wood Marsh Architects and PINK in Melbourne, Australia and the A13 Artscape (London) and M8 (Scotland) projects in the UK. N. Barley, Breathing Cities: The Architecture of Movement (Basel, Birkhäuser, 2000); M. Schwarzer, Zoomscape: architecture in motion and media (New York, Princeton Architectural Press, 2004); P. Wollen and J. Kerr, eds, Autopia: Car and Culture (London, Reaktion, 2002); M. Hvattum, B. Brenna, B. Elvebakk, J. Kampevold Larsen, eds, Routes, Roads and Landscapes (Farnham, Ashgate, 2011). See J. T. Schnapp, ed., Speed Limits (Milan, Skira, 2009), catalogue of the exhibition held at the CCA, Montréal; F. Houben and L. M. Calabrese, eds, Mobility: A room with a view (Rotterdam, NAi Publishers, 2003), edited volume accompanying the 1st International Architecture Biennale in Rotterdam. See C. Girot, 'Vision in Motion: Representing Landscape in Time', in, C. Waldheim, ed., The Landscape Urbanism Reader (New York, Princeton Architectural Press, 2006), pp. 87–103.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it