Optical modal gain in multiple quantum-well semiconductor lasers based on InP
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An approach to determine the optical modal gain spectra in multiple quantum-well semiconductor lasers based on InP in terms of the current at electrodes is presented. The link between the current at the electrodes and the density of carriers inside each quantum well was provided by rate equations with the inclusion of carrier transport effects. Description of hole dispersion is based on a 4 × 4 Luttinger–Kohn Hamiltonian and was done with the electrostatic effects of the carrier charges. Electrostatic effects were included via a self-consistent solution of electron and hole wave equations and the Poisson equation. The optical gain for the TE (transverse electric) mode has been determined with the inclusion of non-Markovian effects, Coulombic enhancement, and band-gap renormalization. The theoretical approach was compared with experimental measurements of the optical gain on a laser structure consisting of four quantum wells using the Hakki–Paoli method. The important role played by the leakage current was revealed when the results were compared. PACS No.: 73.63.Hs, 78.20.Bh, 78.20.Ci
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".