MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965192803 · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/8/305

Stability analysis of multiple scalar field cosmologies with matter

2000· article· en· W1965192803 on OpenAlexafffund
R. J. van den Hoogen, Laura Filion

Bibliographic record

VenueClassical and Quantum Gravity · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsAttractorScalar fieldBarotropic fluidCurvatureMathematical physicsScalar (mathematics)ScalingTheoretical physicsMathematical analysisGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the dynamics of a class of Robertson-Walker spacetimes containing multiple scalar fields and ordinary barotropic matter. The potentials for the scalar fields are assumed to be of an exponential form that are multiplicatively coupled. In this case the effective scalar field potential for the mscalar fields j , (1j m ), has the form V eff= j= 1 m V0 ekj j . We show that the power-law inflationary solution is the local attractor if j= 1 m kj 2< 2. In particular, in the case of two scalar fields, we show that the power-law inflationary solution is indeed the global attractor and hence we make the argument that the power-law inflationary solution is also the global attractor in the mscalar field case. If j= 1 m kj 2> 2 then we further argue that the curvature scaling solution is the global attractor for the open or negatively curved models. If j= 1 m kj 2> 2 then we show that the global attractor for the flat or zero-curvature models is either a power-law solution, a matter scaling solution, or a massless scalar field solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.124
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClassical and Quantum GravitySame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207