Labour Flexibility and Related HRM Practices: A Study of Large Taiwanese Manufacturers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study examines the human resource management practices that may affect labour flexibility, that is, the adaptability of a firm's workforce. A random sample of managers in the largest manufacturers in Taiwan completed a structured questionnaire containing a measure of employee participation as an indicator of a firm's labour flexibility. The results indicated that both the HRM paradigm and credentialism appeared to significantly encourage employee participation. Implications of the findings are discussed. Résumé Cette étude passe en revue les pratiques de la gestion des ressources humaines qui peuvent influencer la ‘soup‐lesse’ de la main‐d'oeuvre, c.‐à‐d., sa capacité d'adaptation. Un nombre de gestionnaires tirés au hasard parmi les plus grandes sociétés Taiwanaises ont complété un sondage détadlé grâce auquel nous avons pu mesuré la participation des employés comme indice de la souplesse de la main d'oeuvre d'une société. Les résultats démontrent que le paradigme du HRM et le “credentialism” semblent encourager de façon significative la participation de la main d'oeuvre. Les conséquences de ces résultats sont ensuite examinées.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".