MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1965202828 · doi:10.1121/1.4785196

Acoustical decoupling of a dome: The adaptive reuse of historic Angelus Temple

2004· article· en· W1965202828 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David A. Conant

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDome (geology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Decoupling (probability)AcousticsGeologyHistoryComputer scienceArtVisual artsArchaeologyEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With its 128-foot-wide, unsupported concrete dome springing 125 feet above the floor of its quarter-circle plan, the original 5300-seat mother church of the International Church of the Foursquare Gospel in Los Angeles (circa 1923) required adaptive reuse as a rock-n-praise Christian church. Challenges included squelching its 7-s RT60, decoupling the dome by eliminating its unusually severe focusing (largely responsible for repetitive echoes), especially strong at the intended audio mix position and stage, integrating acoustical and audio systems design to achieve 118 dBA uniformly throughout, while meeting full operation for opening services within 7 months. Because of its structurally weak dome and its National Register status, the principal acoustical solution prohibited covering, or supporting anything from, the focusing dome. Described is a method not known to have been applied elsewhere intervening about 95% of all the problematic, focusing sound rays with large suspended baffle/absorber panels specifically designed and positioned via laser model studies while achieving an attractive, dramatic array. The result is remarkably successful with respect to all intended acoustical, audio, and historical architecture goals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America→Same topicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation→French-language works237,207→