MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965218838 · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.11.025

Rare Deletions at the Neurexin 3 Locus in Autism Spectrum Disorder

2011· article· en· W1965218838 on OpenAlexafffund
Andrea K. Vaags, Anath C. Lionel, Daisuke Sato, McKinsey L. Goodenberger, Quinn Stein, Sarah Curran, Caroline Mackie Ogilvie, Joo Wook Ahn, Irene Drmic, Lili Senman, Christina Chrysler, Ann Thompson, Carolyn Russell, Aparna Prasad, Susan Walker, Dalila Pinto, Christian R. Marshall, Dimitri J. Stavropoulos, Lonnie Zwaigenbaum, Bridget A. Fernandez, Éric Fombonne, Patrick Bolton, David Collier, Jennelle C. Hodge, Wendy Roberts, Péter Szatmári, Stephen W. Scherer

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Human Genetics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Canadian institutionsHolland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalMcGill UniversityMontreal Children's HospitalMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of AlbertaMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHospital for Sick ChildrenOntario Genomics InstituteCanada Foundation for InnovationCentre for Applied GenomicsNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchSick Kids FoundationGenome CanadaWellcome TrustCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchUniversity of OttawaOntario Ministry of Research, Innovation and ScienceAutism Speaks
KeywordsNeurexinAutism spectrum disorderLocus (genetics)GeneticsAutismPsychologyBiologyPsychiatryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations215
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Human GeneticsSame topicGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207