MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965237669 · doi:10.1063/1.1539918

Resonant cavity enhancement in heterojunction GaAs/AlGaAs terahertz detectors

2003· article· en· W1965237669 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsResponsivityTerahertz radiationMaterials scienceHeterojunctionOptoelectronicsAbsorption (acoustics)DetectorResonance (particle physics)PhotodetectorWork functionFar infraredReflection (computer programming)InfraredOpticsAtomic physicsNanotechnologyPhysicsLayer (electronics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The room-temperature absorption and reflection spectra in the range of 5–100 μm (3–60 THz) for multilayer heterojunction interfacial work function internal photoemission (HEIWIP) GaAs/AlGaAs far-infrared (FIR) detectors are presented. Calculated results based on the free carrier absorption and interaction with optical phonons are found to be in good agreement with the experimental results. Experimental responsivity spectra demonstrate the expected maxima from the absorption measurements due to resonant cavity effects. It is shown that the resonance cavity architecture enhances the performance of the FIR HEIWIP detectors and further improvement is proposed through the use of n++ and p++ bottom contact layers or doped substrates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it