From Labour of Love to Decent Work: Protecting the Human Rights of Migrant Caregivers in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Cet article explore la notion de protection des travailleuses et travailleurs migrants ainsi que d'autres aspects du développement durable se rapportant à la division internationale du travail dans le secteur canadien des soins domestiques. L'auteur examineLe Programme des aides familiaux résidants(PAFR) en se penchant sur la question du droit international des droits de la personne, des normes internationales du travail, de la protection des travailleurs migrants et des objectifs de développement durable propres à la réglementation canadienne d'immigration. Démontrant comment les bases légales du PAFR empêchent les travailleurs migrants de jouir de certains droits humains et de certains droits fondamentaux du travail, l'auteur revendique l'abolition des obstacles structuraux de ce programme de travail. Elle propose un ré-aménagement du PAFR à partir d'une approche favorisant le développement humain, où davantage d'emphase est mise sur l'élargissement des capacités et du potentiel socioéconomique des travailleurs migrants au sein du marché du travail canadien.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".