MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965309077 · doi:10.3917/riges.293.0054

Planifier la relève dans un contexte de vieillissement de la main-d'œuvre

2004· article· fr· W1965309077 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Tania Saba, Gilles Guérin

Bibliographic record

VenueGestion · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Le vieillissement de la population canadienne et de celle de la plupart des pays industrialisés est un phénomène largement admis. Il influe sur la planification de la relève dans les organisations, qui doivent remédier aux pénuries de main-d’œuvre et assurer le remplacement des ressources humaines. En fin de carrière, les travailleurs peuvent se prévaloir des programmes de retraite anticipée, choisir de travailler plus longtemps ou opter pour une retraite progressive. Les défis liés à la relève sont de taille, puisque la prévision des besoins de main-d’œuvre s’avère un processus complexe qui doit composer avec des préférences individuelles, des contextes économiques et des politiques publiques. Cet article tente de préciser les stratégies et les actions organisationnelles qui permettraient un meilleur arrimage entre les besoins organisationnels et ceux des individus à l’approche de la retraite. Dans ce but sont examinés les attitudes des travailleurs, les nouvelles tendances des politiques publiques en matière de retraite et les défis organisationnels face au vieillissement de la main-d’œuvre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.008
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGestionSame topicOccupational Health and Safety ResearchFrench-language works237,207